Describe the workflow.
We will map the agent.
Tell us the workflow your team keeps doing by hand. We'll map the agent — sources, permissions, approvals, and the first measurable output.
Prefer to skip the form? Email saad@astrointelligence.io or grab a 30-min slot.
What happens next
1. Engineer Review
Your note goes straight into a technical workflow review. We identify the sources, permissions, approvals, and output the first agent would need.
2. Zero-Friction Response
If the workflow fits, we reply with a direct assessment: what the agent can replace, what must stay human-approved, and what should ship first.
3. Technical Qualification
The first call is a working session. We map connectors, guardrails, audit trail, and the smallest measurable workflow worth building.
What happens after you send it?
We turn your note into a first-agent map: sources, permissions, action boundaries, output format, and the smallest workflow worth replacing.
How we evaluate incoming operational problems
We're usually a fit when one workflow crosses tools, people, permissions, and recurring business output.
That includes reports nobody wants to build, search nobody trusts, admin steps that steal hours, and internal systems that should be controlled by one company-specific agent instead of five separate tools.
What kinds of problems are the best fit?
A recurring workflow that is expensive, annoying, or fragmented: monthly reports, internal research, ticket routing, calendar coordination, admin follow-up, or knowledge search across company systems.
What should we include in our message?
Describe the workflow, the systems involved, who approves sensitive steps, what output the business needs, and what tools the team currently pays for to get the job done.
Do you work with internal teams or just customer-facing products?
Both. The strongest fit is usually internal operations first: agents connected to Microsoft Graph, files, tickets, calendars, CRMs, finance exports, and the approval paths teams already use.